From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 3 14:46:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636E916A4CF for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 14:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0714F43D66 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 14:46:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 11571 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Apr 2004 22:46:34 -0000 Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 14:46:34 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20040403200844.GA18516@regency.nsu.ru> Message-ID: <20040403144540.Q11430@root.org> References: <20040331211028.37B5016A4E2@hub.freebsd.org> <20040331134609.N90425@root.org> <20040401105857.GA72284@regency.nsu.ru> <20040403200844.GA18516@regency.nsu.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_ste.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:46:33 -0000 On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 04:50:11PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:58:57PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 09:42:41AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:47:16PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > [...] > > > > > This pollutes the toplevel hw sysctl space. Please move it to > > > > > hw.ste.rxsyncs or better, debug.*. > > > > > > > > > Seems I followed the bad practice from dc(4) and fxp(4). I will > > > > move it to hw.ste, thanks. > > > > > > Care to fix this "bad practice" in dc(4) and fxp(4) as well? :) Or > > > should we wait for their maintainers, or possibly filling the PR ? > > > > > Better submit a patch, it should be pretty trivial. ;) > > OK, I'll do it in a couple of days, hopefully for both dc(4) and fxp(4). Thank you. In general, I only want a PR if the problem is complex or needs further debugging. People with simple changes for code I'm active in should just send a patch. -Nate