From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 2 16:56:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F6437B417 for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD3E4CE1E; Thu, 2 May 2002 19:56:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02718; Thu, 2 May 2002 19:56:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id QAA25851; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205022356.QAA25851@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Subject: Re: savcore dump names? Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:56:43 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.4/makemail 2.9b Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >...I said clearly from the >start that as far as savecore was concerned, people should consider >me run over by a bus. I think that's what upset me most about these changes. From my vantage point, you said "I am going to take away these pieces of functionality; if they are important enough someone else will reimplement them and anyone who needs them in the meantime is screwed." That's not a good way for the project to work. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message