From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Sep 21 0:42:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903A637B423; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA31918; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:42:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: Jordan Hubbard , Laurence Berland , Bill Fumerola , clefevre@citeweb.net, Akbar , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wats so special about freeBSD? References: <99016.969437392@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <20000920125405.D22272@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Sep 2000 09:42:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Crist J . Clark"'s message of "Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:54:05 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Crist J . Clark" writes: > From a review of /etc/defaults/rc.conf, 5.0-CURRENT has turned off the > three biggies that I didn't like the default YES, > > inetd_enable="NO" > sendmail_enable="NO" > portmap_enable="NO" > > But I assume /stand/sysinstall will ask if these should be turned on. > This is good. Actually, IIRC, sysinstall turns them on by default for POLA reasons. But at least now you can see from your rc.conf that they're on. > And if one were to get really paraniod (and it is my job to be these > days), /proc should not be put in a sysinstall generated fstab without > warning the user due to its checkered security history /proc should be fine now. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message