From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 27 00:10:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43DB16A407; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A643113C474; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C081E119F; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:10:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:10:56 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: nq/VSu6l91fD6tNoS1qJvaGeQeq62nyyCQjNOfd4ehBH 1172535056 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532E41A1C7; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:10:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45E3770F.1030109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:10:55 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnn@FreeBSD.org References: <20070223121703.GA86159@fupp.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anders Nordby , net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Networking FreeBSD Wiki X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:10:57 -0000 gnn@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> >> George, maybe there should be a separate category in GNATS also, for >> network issues? >> > > Instead of being in kern you mean? I have thought that before but I > don't control GNATS and we'd have to review a lot of bugs. > I have noticed there has been a gradual effort over time by the Bugmeisters to classify bugs by putting [netinet] or other strings in the one-line bug synopsis. Whilst this is a great help, it still doesn't address many of the issues we have with GNATS, upon which consensus has not yet been reached as to how to go forward. Personally, I'd like to blow GNATS up and replace it with Bugzilla. Regards, BMS