From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 19:54:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E00A106564A for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A53114DB44; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DBB177F.7080004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:54:39 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Stone References: <4DBB01D9.2060805@FreeBSD.org> <4DBB09FA.1040108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d scripts can be missed if they aren't ordered with respect to the early-late divider X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:54:43 -0000 On 04/29/2011 12:52, Ryan Stone wrote: > rcorder accepts a -s option to have it skip a file and not print it. > Would it make sense to instead use that to filter out the scripts that > have already run, or are there other consequences of the -s that we > don't want? The -s option to rcorder only applies to KEYWORD in the script, not the names of scripts. More good creative thought though, keep it up. :) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/