Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:54:39 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d scripts can be missed if they aren't ordered with respect to the early-late divider Message-ID: <4DBB177F.7080004@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinO3w%2BkKXqSV5j%2B%2BACkXG69d4Krdw@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=FH4DeB-bH9Dcre_U-5J%2BP%2B3o_BA@mail.gmail.com> <4DBB01D9.2060805@FreeBSD.org> <4DBB09FA.1040108@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTinO3w%2BkKXqSV5j%2B%2BACkXG69d4Krdw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/29/2011 12:52, Ryan Stone wrote: > rcorder accepts a -s option to have it skip a file and not print it. > Would it make sense to instead use that to filter out the scripts that > have already run, or are there other consequences of the -s that we > don't want? The -s option to rcorder only applies to KEYWORD in the script, not the names of scripts. More good creative thought though, keep it up. :) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DBB177F.7080004>