Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:19:50 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: help with ln "linking" Please! [attn manpage authors!] Message-ID: <20021008221950.GG81796@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <200210082214.g98MEngt064064@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <zgsmzg69y1.mzg@localhost.localdomain> <200210082214.g98MEngt064064@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (10.08.2002 @ 1514 PST): Oliver Fromme said, in 1.2K: <<
> ln [-fhinv] existing_filename [another_filename]
> ln -s [-fhinv] symlink_target [symlink_name]
>
> That would be completely clear, IMO. Although maybe a bit
> too verbose.
too verbose? i disagree.
> (OK, in the case of symlinks it doesn't really
> have to exist), and the new thing comes last.
most people who would benefit from having ln spelled out for them
probably won't be doing terribly difficult things with it ::)
-Adam
--
"Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw."
-Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch"
Adam Weinberger
adam@vectors.cx
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021008221950.GG81796>