Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:38:13 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Lee Harr" <missive@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade? Message-ID: <200503141438.14896.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BAY2-F34B3E41CF7962791E0438BB1560@phx.gbl> References: <BAY2-F34B3E41CF7962791E0438BB1560@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 March 2005 02:28 pm, Lee Harr wrote: > >I think there is no big difference between just running portupgrade > > vs portmanager. I would say portmanager is better and faster > > because you don't need to baby sit, it is really automagical, and > > there is no messing with an index. > > I keep hearing great things about portmanager, but I have > not been able to run it... when I try, I get: > > > # portmanager -s > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_3 info: Creating inital data bases > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- PMGRrVerifyContentsFile 0.2.9_3 error: could not open > /var/db/pkg/mailman-2.1.5_2/+CONTENTS > system message: No such file or directory > Assertion failed: (0), function PMGRrVerifyContentsFile, file > PMGRrVerifyContentsFile.c,line 75. > Abort (core dumped) > > > What am I doing wrong? Does /var/db/pkg/mailman-2.1.5_2 exist on your system? If so does /var/db/pkg/mailman-2.1.5_2/+CONTENTS exist? -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503141438.14896.ringworm01>