From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 25 2:16:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA17937B401 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 20961 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Jan 2001 10:14:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:14:47 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Dirk Froemberg Cc: Radovan Gibala , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB Message-ID: <20010125121447.D578@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Dirk Froemberg , Radovan Gibala , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <3A6C158C.7F8794B1@agraf.sk> <20010122185314.D5657@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010123144920.I2376@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010123213126.A46311@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010123213126.A46311@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>; from dirk@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:31:27PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Dirk Froemberg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:49:20PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: [snip] > > I decided to include BDB as part of the mysql build. So the patching > -ldb -> -ldb3 isn't neccessary any longer. (But I would have included > it in patch-ag... 8-) > > Is there any reason why you made the BDB part optional? I'd like to > include it generally. Well, sorry for the lack of comments :) I did not want to comment before I'd tested your patches, and I lacked the time to do so; now that you've committed them, they look just fine :) To the original poster: Update your ports collection, the mysql323-server port now comes with Berkeley DB support. G'luck, Peter -- The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message