From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 16 09:13:40 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5DDD88;
 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cg@cgross.info)
Received: from alpha.kreiz-it.fr (alpha.kreiz-it.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:dda6::1])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555002D5C;
 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:13:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DirTech (lnr56-1-82-246-51-185.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.51.185])
 by alpha.kreiz-it.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7599A40;
 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Cedric GROSS" <cg@cgross.info>
To: "'Adrian Chadd'" <adrian@freebsd.org>
References: <002701cebc6f$634c0040$29e400c0$@info>	<CAJ-VmonSS9Y9X0=3XndD-JX6boSW7NcGXwyv0Ra3e5+0UEaUhg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJ-Vmom_YD-1p85hNfAQBte9AjfZ7N6U-=++c4qw9VZcSKB66g@mail.gmail.com>	<003301cebdeb$fc941350$f5bc39f0$@info>	<1381762883.2593.0.camel@localhost>	<002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info>
 <CAJ-VmomWAMEEie8zK=p6Z=X+gDb71Y7nzyuh_upeKZZ+ADsaDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomWAMEEie8zK=p6Z=X+gDb71Y7nzyuh_upeKZZ+ADsaDw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [IWN] Review
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:13:20 +0200
Message-ID: <003101ceca4f$fea3fc30$fbebf490$@info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac7KLA1AoZFVb9heTLWD3L4vl5ZaaQAIzN7g
Content-Language: fr
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
 tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:13:40 -0000

Hello Adrian,

=20

It=92s up to you.

If you wish to continue commit  small part review split_6, split_7 and
split_8. Or directly test and commit split_8.

=20

>From split_8, it=92s remaining Sean=92s work :

-          Led management

-          Power supply management

=20

After that, freebsd repo will be at same level as my github repo.=20

And may be will able to work on improving speed and add hostap mode.

=20

Cedric

=20

=20

De : adrian.chadd@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com] De la part =
de
Adrian Chadd
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 16 octobre 2013 06:56
=C0 : Cedric GROSS
Cc : Sean Bruno; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [IWN] Review

=20

Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then =
merge
in more stuff from you?

=20

=20

-adrian

=20

=20

On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <cg@cgross.info> wrote:

> De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com]
> =C0 : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : RE: [IWN] Review

>
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now.
> >
> > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD.
> > Cedric
>
> Cedric:

Hi Sean,


>
> Which branch should we be testing?
>

As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an
split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC.

Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC =
series.
Could be a good idea to test this version with =E0 lot of NIC.

> sean

Thanks
Cedric

=20