From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Jan 17 00:29:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD2D1FB22A for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yp@xvoid.org) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47zMQB3GqZz3LLQ for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yp@xvoid.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8677674EA; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:29:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:29:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xvoid.org; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=G tpId3U+3nkpqB0QubLHzdec95RSd9o7ntcBDJnTBjs=; b=O143z+2yOdM0XTx+m LNTr//5kG87HplCbLGG18WHOUyAkOQD/XLRddIonu5Blek+kCu66ymrl2/OddfsF RTZBXJMCh8L2cB/Xi7W3W30MsB71wbwYYkUrP6Hu93uvTWbIdBAxbUpz5XfyVGhi /SVXsJlgDQT8Gppd8a3ponaJ0IYwp8EO7NYtjgkH6dtDrhcMhE8lOir752ZDZimF ObBzO4Q59EEJVWvgGg6oN1CuPzfsH/HtIK/wl6qWbQBoMuuk2OeU7OrSehvuhwHF QcoRF384/nMuq4MUf86JBtOhipsM3wgsssm6eEcHgUP6JdP3jnBdOaeqAXhR2qFm OoOaw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=GtpId3U+3nkpqB0QubLHzdec95RSd9o7ntcBDJnTB js=; b=ap4+pld9DDlRwsGkfM94u0CEtkikf2WzbUMJZ7TtlvjjuIuebVxOfKGGT LnE60CwxttYMCQAqBO7gjKvmcEQxgexdPknVsJTWQVh4PpVHX7J/ipziDdjLhSAs eUxrjp7ZpRvURAdiM/IkLTXOT2FK/lLhUWZvmi7v6/65Vary/73XS2Bk6rMwgyYa jslXuMoCt+t+BvXYTNVExitRTWZCL0g5P6L9E6bOUYbtmw3T1EogAnlXWvkkZJQN /zVkENGO1+grYJbioiUa2quc81zV/MdSJGjx/l4HbVWz836NaDAa6jsQFw0KRrsh AGckf4QRD9XzIu87+/gdue2dF5xqQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrtdeigddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpegjuhhrihcu rfgrnhhkohhvuceohihpseigvhhoihgurdhorhhgqeenucffohhmrghinheptggrthifhh hishhkvghrrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeekrdduheehrdegrdekleenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhephihpseigvhhoihgurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from [192.168.1.8] (unknown [178.155.4.89]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E0E0680060; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:29:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: 13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS To: David Wolfskill , Clay Daniels , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" References: <20200117002639.GM1192@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Yuri Pankov Message-ID: <59e98ff2-57c2-f618-643b-f73436149061@xvoid.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:29:34 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200117002639.GM1192@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47zMQB3GqZz3LLQ X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=xvoid.org header.s=fm1 header.b=O143z+2y; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=ap4+pld9; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yp@xvoid.org designates 66.111.4.221 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yp@xvoid.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.09 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:66.111.4.221]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[221.4.111.66.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[xvoid.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.49)[ip: (-9.81), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.89), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[221.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[89.4.155.178.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[89.4.155.178.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.4]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[xvoid.org:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.60)[-0.598,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[xvoid.org]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.27)[0.274,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:29:39 -0000 David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote: >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a loop >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine... >> >> Clay >> .... > > Err...? Is there some additional context that I'm missing? > > I've been tracking head daily for ... longer than I really want to > think about, including on at least one system that has no ZFS file > systems; the last couple of smoke-tests were at: > > FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #7 r356758M/356758: Wed Jan 15 03:49:49 PST 2020 root@g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1300076 1300076 > > and > > FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #8 r356786M/356787: Thu Jan 16 03:56:45 PST 2020 root@g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1300076 1300076 > > It is not clear to me at what point anything might have a chance > to indicate that it "wanted ZFS" and request an action. Likely it's about the latest 13.0-CURRENT snapshot image (r356767) and the change to bsdinstall to make ZFS default partitioning scheme, now discussed on arch@.