From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 18 15:10:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA21176 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 15:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA21167; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 15:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 15:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199708182210.PAA21167@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports Cc: From: "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: ports/4326: ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install Reply-To: "Julian H. Stacey" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR ports/4326; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Julian H. Stacey" To: Bill Fenner Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/4326: ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:06:09 +0200 Reference: > From: Bill Fenner > Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 14:59:19 PDT > Message-id: <97Aug17.145925pdt.177513@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Hi, Bill Fenner wrote: > "Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org" wrote: > > ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install > > Presumably because you fetched them via ftp or copied via MSDOS or some > other way which doesn't preserve the x bit. It's set in the repository > and in my checked-out tree. CTM actually. > Should bsd.port.mk take care of this? > > Bill Good question, would be nice if either ctm or bsd.port.mk handled it, ctm for preference, (but I'm on thin ice here I guess: `patches please' I hear people preparing to type, & I'm busy (aren't we all :-) Julian -- Julian H. Stacey jhs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/