From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 03:54:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C70106566C for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52B08FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so3207762pzk.13 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:54:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=T7h+uf+C2K8Fx23uL+hjF7J3U1QO346WCrzGruimICk=; b=wb9c2+f/jaw+FbZFjGmvbQzO/Wlo2Quf0yhCkhhQ54UTL3IAMMOxKPymCo3jZ3ZoWo e3t0ZEhOuO+DeDq4gl+MTdXkcL1UKUcLtapis6YUTgb4S/O/6PBPn8NVKlHXiVCsDMco 8Xn1tbzcQUGtKAayBxhAjx/hKRh0FF5s/QtjA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; b=Yqn2hzHZALZn02d7Lp9c2eKRmAzWSZ7C7rNfzMJ1EhmQ26YHabrIixV2uKGAZ/AYFR 4waCbLThOChFUwcH3kOwcrfB7oRLgYaaUMjVvP371e33VzgrIcNsgSVwxgYdGOb1FTtb n21s+ioUcOqojYJsnvUnVyV9cPGHsm2+eeMsY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.24.102 with SMTP id t6mr2231541pbf.503.1309060468138; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.41.39 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:54:28 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: pgj@FreeBSD.org, Eric McCorkle Subject: Re: GHC Port on 9-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:54:29 -0000 >In any case, the port builds fine with GCC. Perhaps it would be prudent >to set CC=gcc and CXX=g++ in the makefile for the time being and mark >the port as working again? Please don't hardcode the compilers: users may be using other compilers, or may still wish to experiment with clang, without having to patch the port or override the Makefile. Instead, if you feel it is necessary, print a warning, or set IGNORE=... if clang or another known bad compiler is chosen. b.