From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 09:21:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0EB1065670 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from kientzle.com (kientzle.com [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2138FC0A for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.123.2.23] (h-66-166-149-52.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.52]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n0H9KvC1047681; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:20:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4971A2F2.7060509@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:20:50 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sean C. Farley" References: <20090115084515.GA91157@freebsd.org> <496F0D1D.7080505@andric.com> <6c51dbb10901150344s409cd834p3cd8fae189e42a68@mail.gmail.com> <9225949D37F24E01AA5FC01169A256F2@PegaPegII> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pegasus Mc Cleaft , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standardcompiler?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:21:01 -0000 Sean C. Farley wrote: > > For an archiver, what about tar (bsdtar)? tar tf /usr/lib/libc.a works > for me. :) Actually, there is some development[1] to replace those > utilities with BSD-licensed versions. ar has already been replaced in > HEAD. Kai Wang added "ar" format to libarchive, so tar and cpio in -CURRENT can both read and write ar archives. But that doesn't mean that tar can serve as a replacement for ar. The "ar" utility does have a few tricks. ;-) Kai and I did at one time discuss the feasability of using tar or cpio format as a library archive format. It does have a certain appeal (the "ar" format is fairly gruesome, especially the Gnu/SysV long filename extension) but is probably not worth the effort. Tim