Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:52:41 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcelm@juniper.net>
To:        "vendors@freebsd.org" <vendors@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Unit/component testing
Message-ID:  <F86258CE-2D8A-4591-8FD7-D696EA5B76EA@juniper.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
All,

Juniper is currently working on a clean slate reimplementation of
Junos on top of the latest FreeBSD. In the current stage we're
carving out where we aim to have interfaces and morph towards
that.

Juniper also switches the development model to focus on FreeBSD
-current for new features and (internally) release based on a
-stable version.

Connect these two "dots" and what we seek is strong whitebox, unit
and component testing in support of this.
Juniper is eager to find out what's out there already WRT to
1)  stability/reliability testing (e.g. stress2),
2)  performance and scalability testing (e.g. netperf),
3)  conformance and API stability testing (e.g. posix), and
4)  functional regression or unit testing (...)

We like to leverage as much as possible and help fill in the gaps
by bootstrapping new test suites and/or expand on what's out there.

There's already a bunch out there on the FreeBSD wiki, but we
especially like to hear from other vendors. Commercial solutions
are obviously viable for us.

Please shoot me an email about something you know in this area.
I'll collect the feedback and draft a summary. In-house suites
that you think should and could be shared and made public are
also of interest.

Thanks and have a good weekend,

--=20
Marcel Moolenaar
marcelm@juniper.net





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F86258CE-2D8A-4591-8FD7-D696EA5B76EA>