From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 30 10:07:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A015A16A4CE for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:07:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93143D3F for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:07:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no (151.80-202-173.nextgentel.com [80.202.173.151]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DC5176EF for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:07:51 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:06:58 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041030120658.1f731beb.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20041029195025.GA13306@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041029142314.50f154d3.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20041029195025.GA13306@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq;m"_0v;~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Buildworld on an Ultra1E - exception - what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:07:03 -0000 On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:50:25 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Hardware failure, apparently. From a reply when it happened to me > on a particular machine (now decomissioned): Aha. Hmm, sounds bad. Does anyone know what can be done about it? I set diag-switch? true in OBP, and the machine ran a full post without any errors cropping up (stress test of both memory and ECache passed). But I don't know if that means anything. Does something like memtest86+ (http://www.memtest.org/) exist for the Sparc64 platform? I have another Ultra 1 here, perhaps I should try to swap cpu's in them an see what happens. I will just have to read up on how to do that first. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway