From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Aug  8 16:31:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA22381
          for isp-outgoing; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 16:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhf.wdc.net (uhf.4d.net [207.137.157.140])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA22372
          for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bad@localhost) by uhf.wdc.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA02346; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 19:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 19:35:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net>
X-Sender: bad@uhf.wdc.net
To: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: freebsd/dhcp on Cox's cable system.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.UW2.3.95.970808155004.5459G-100000@cedb>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970808193311.2341A-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Quick followup on my reference here.  The stable branch only has server
> code, You'll need the developpment track for client stuff
> 

I thought so. Thanks for the revised pointer. Has anyone done any
performance comparisons between wide-dhcp and isc-dhcp? ISC's stuff 
generaly has a great reputation, but I stayed away from their dhcp
server because I didn't know about the client.

Bernie