Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:18:36 -0700 From: George Hartzell <hartzell@alerce.com> To: Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= <romain@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem overriding ports with portshaker. Message-ID: <23947.37724.943422.207082@alice.local> In-Reply-To: <20190925041645.GA11443@blogreen.org> References: <23943.45748.104392.96450@alice.local> <23945.3567.44900.631073@alice.local> <20190925041645.GA11443@blogreen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Romain Tarti=C3=A8re writes: > [...] > Can you try setting PORTSDIR to your target ports tree, e.g. >=20 > % sudo env PORTSDIR=3D/usr/local/poudriere/ports/default portshaker = -M Setting PORTSDIR fixes it for me (different directory, but it works). > My guess is that since Mk/bsd.port.mk was not found, ARCH is not set= and > the Makefile is malformed. Sounds right. > If you confirm it fixes your issue, I'll commit something to do this= > automagically. It does not really make sense to not set PORTSDIR to= the > target ports tree IMO=E2=80=A6 I wasn't aware of PORTSDIR, I'm a long time ports user but this is my first foray into not simply using the stock FreeBSD ports tree. I assumed (!!!) that portshaker knew everything that it needed to know about where the trees were and was doing all of the magic for me. Thanks for the help! g.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23947.37724.943422.207082>