From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 21 21:54:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE67016A4CE; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948D843D1D; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:54:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1M5sIOJ081619; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:54:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i1M5sH5e081618; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:54:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:54:17 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ted Cabeen Message-ID: <20040222055417.GA3941@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <87u11p8sl6.fsf@gray.impulse.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87u11p8sl6.fsf@gray.impulse.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 05:54:19 -0000 On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:32:37AM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote: > A /usr/local/etc/rc.conf file would be a nice solution to this > problem. As I see it, that file would only be used when starting > programs that live in /usr/local/etc/rc.d and use the rc system. > Built-in programs would continue to use /etc/rc.conf. I dare say people aren't aware that one can also create /etc/rc.conf.d/ with "_enable=yes" in it. > Making this change would only require a small change to > /usr/local/etc/rc.subr. I can submit a patch or a PR if needed. WHY in the world is there even a /usr/local/etc/rc.subr ??? /etc/rc.subr on 5-CURRENT is perfectly fine.