From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 06:43:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A868616A41F for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:43:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2903843D49 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:43:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5Q6h9YB004776; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:43:09 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j5Q6h98P004775; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:43:09 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:43:09 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Mike Silbersack Message-ID: <20050626064309.GA4700@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Mike Silbersack , Peter Holm , current@freebsd.org, Thierry Herbelot References: <20050624212729.C537@odysseus.silby.com> <20050625133052.GA23599@peter.osted.lan> <1437.64.215.82.94.1119717536.squirrel@webmail2.pair.com> <20050625173217.GA24306@peter.osted.lan> <20050625171206.S935@odysseus.silby.com> <20050626021729.GA1991@nagual.pp.ru> <20050626012002.H935@odysseus.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050626012002.H935@odysseus.silby.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: current@freebsd.org, Thierry Herbelot Subject: Re: Mbuf double-free guilty party detection patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:43:11 -0000 On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:20:47AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > Yes and no. Your results tell me that it's probably not a simple use > after free, but rather something smashing all over memory for some reason. It sounds nasty, but I observe no strange behaviour of TCP connections at all for a long time. I have a lots of them actively running sshd, sendmail, popper, ftpd, bind, httpd and cvsupd servers. -- http://ache.pp.ru/