From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  5 02:09:10 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E97816A4CE
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Feb 2005 02:09:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tydfam.jp (ns.tydfam.jp [61.197.228.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE0143D49
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Feb 2005 02:09:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp)
Received: from localhost (tyd3.sub.tydfam.jp [192.168.1.3])
	by tydfam.jp (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j15294uv030222;
	Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:09:05 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 11:09:05 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20050205.110905.846934680.ken@tydfam.jp>
To: islero@comcast.net
From: Yamada Ken Takeshi <ken@tydfam.jp>
In-Reply-To: <1107545118.55515.5.camel@juniper.santafe.lan>
References: <1107545118.55515.5.camel@juniper.santafe.lan>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: java/jdk15 build failure on amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 02:09:10 -0000

  I think that you do not need to do any to 
compile jdk15 under the most updated -current.
  I successfully compiled jdk15 without any 
tweaks, seemingly the system problem - buffer 
handling.  

  I hope that jdk guys concentrate their effort
on optimization now.