From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Jun 13  5:57:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E1337B405
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5DCuMp42295;
	Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:56:22 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from ru)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:56:22 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: Lista <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: a comment about a recent change on the route(8) command
Message-ID: <20010613155622.B30602@sunbay.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es>,
	Lista <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <y7vpuc8sj4c.wl@condor.jinmei.org> <3B27538F.BD0AFFC@it.uc3m.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3B27538F.BD0AFFC@it.uc3m.es>; from jrh@it.uc3m.es on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:50:39PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:50:39PM +0200, Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> JINMEI Tatuya / =1B$B?@L@C#:H=1B(B escribio:
> >=20
> > I have a tiny comment about the following change to the route(8)
> > command:
> > http://www.jp.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/route/route.c.diff?r1=
=3D1.49&r2=3D1.50
> >=20
> > In the commit log, the committer said
> >=20
> >   Fixed the -iface breakage introduced with the latest KAME merge
> >   in revision 1.48.  It is pretty valid and often feasible to use
> >   a non-point-to-point interface as the gateway.
>=20
> In which cases makes sense to use a non-ptp interface as the gateway?
> What is the behaviour in that case ?
>=20
ARP.

--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Oracle Developer/DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message