From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 31 15:58:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5A1AE8
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351655F2
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9VFwIgw008110
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:58:18 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193533] [New Port]: devel/fsnotifier: fsNotifier for IntelliJ
 IDEA
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:58:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-193533-13-NwzmHGJ9w9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193533-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193533-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:58:18 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193533

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Needs Triage                |Open
                 CC|                            |marino@FreeBSD.org
           Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |marino@FreeBSD.org
                   |org                         |

--- Comment #2 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
FYI: redports is now useless for QA testing but this is very simple port

This line: "PLIST_FILES=    bin/${PORTNAME} bin/${PORTNAME}64"

Is unacceptable to me.  If I change the name of the port, the port fails, yes? 
It's a huge pet peeve of mine to use PORTNAME like this, so I'm going to
replace it with the current value of PORTNAME.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.