Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Mar 1999 02:46:07 -0500
From:      "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Mail server setup 
Message-ID:  <73188.921138367@gjp.erols.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ delete all trace of previous message so as not to think any one person
  is being picked upon ]

I'm really rather astounded at the number of people here who seem to think 
that NFS is real solution to scaling large server farms. Its not. NFS is a 
gross hack. It works, sure. But it is far from the ideal solution to an 
internet providers problems. We've got a NFS based web server farm at work, 
and although I have no connection to the web department, I'm constantly 
beating them over the head to replace it as the machines they are using (and 
are pushing the limits of) could push a lot more traffic if they only had 
local storage.
The stateless nature of NFS means that a lot of the work done to optimize the 
VM system and to merge in the I/O buffer cache is wasted, and you have to go 
to the wire for requests for the same data that you queried 10ms ago.

Simply put: NFS has its place. Performance-critical systems isn't one of the 
areas NFS is suited for. Not unless you want to throw a lot more hardware at 
the problem than you really need to.

Yes, this is verging on a religious argument. However, the fact that even Sun 
now says that NFS mounted /var/mail spools is a bad idea speaks volumes.

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73188.921138367>