From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Feb 10 08:35:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA29785
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 08:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from terra.Sarnoff.COM (terra.sarnoff.com [130.33.11.203])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA29780
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 08:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rminnich@localhost) by terra.Sarnoff.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA25938; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 11:31:36 -0500
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 11:31:35 -0500 (EST)
From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM>
To: "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CAP (Columbia AppleTalk Protocol) - status?
In-Reply-To: <199602101459.PAA03399@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960210113055.25928A@terra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


> Windows NT (shudder) Server has built in AppleTalk Server capabilities.
> It would be nice if FreeBSD would be delivered with that too.
> There is CAP and I believe NetATalk.

you want netatalk if you use anything. It's very nice. It won't currently 
compile on freebsd, but since it will work on sunos i doubt there's much 
to it. Linux has native netatalk support, freebsd should too.

ron