Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:25:36 +1000 From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 586Core Message-ID: <20040914072536.GD69109@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20040914.012056.106261879.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20040914032642.GB69109@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> <20040914.003940.97852010.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040914064440.GC69109@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> <20040914.012056.106261879.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 01:20:56AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20040914064440.GC69109@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> > John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> writes: > : On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:39:40AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > Their serial BIOS is a pain to use, but for most applications it > : > doesn't matter at all... > : > : What problems do you have with it? It seems to work fine for me once > : I build FreeBSD to it's fixed baud rate. > > tabbing between items is a bit painful. We've also had issue where it > wouldn't boot off the second device if the first one were missing. > Nothing major or earth shattering, but it took some getting used to. *Phew* 8-) -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040914072536.GD69109>