Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 17:51:00 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Volker Stolz <vs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk? Message-ID: <200405031751.00676.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <409668B4.30901@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040503122023.GF27940@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <200405031728.36587.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <409668B4.30901@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_kpmlA3p4R5kbGs+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port > > maintainers serves no purpose? > > It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before* > including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not.=20 No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry= =20 *after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_kpmlA3p4R5kbGs+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAlmpkXhc68WspdLARAsAlAJ9vBl8/mUVwSSjHypXB0YJC8eDhyACeKEr9 mzRE+Qw8pqGs+qsz0Z7AWJw= =ZE/1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_kpmlA3p4R5kbGs+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405031751.00676.michaelnottebrock>