From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 11:43:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F050319; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 11:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dumbbell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.made4.biz (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:7018::1:3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0C8FC16; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 11:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a01:e35:8b20:ae00:290:f5ff:fe9d:b78c] (helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TelTe-000GYI-K1; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: <50B9ED54.4010809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:43:16 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: [rfc] bind curthread to target cpu for _CST change notification References: <50AE3C66.2050207@FreeBSD.org> <1353872249.20189.3.camel@powernoodle> <50B77F4B.8070701@FreeBSD.org> <50B8951D.1000609@FreeBSD.org> <50B9C7B6.1040306@FreeBSD.org> <50B9C968.70804@FreeBSD.org> <50B9CACB.8030903@FreeBSD.org> <50B9E2CB.3010002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50B9E2CB.3010002@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEB22CA24BFAC3E7E0B1A4900" Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 11:43:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEB22CA24BFAC3E7E0B1A4900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01.12.2012 11:58, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 01/12/2012 11:15 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron said the following: >> On 01.12.2012 10:10, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 01/12/2012 11:02 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron said the following: >>>> By the way, should _CST appear in a dump from acpidump(8)? >>> >>> Yes, it depends... :-) _CST could be defined in a dynamically loadabl= e >>> region. If you do not see _CST in the DSDT but see Load() calls, the= n >>> that's the most likely explanation. >> >> How do I see these Load() calls? Are they related to the ACPI_LV_LOAD = level >> in debug.acpi.level? >=20 > acpidump -dt > somefile.asl > vi somefile.asl > /Load >=20 > :-) Right :) Yes, there're Load() calls: ... Load (CST0, HC0) ... Thank you! --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --------------enigEB22CA24BFAC3E7E0B1A4900 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC57VoACgkQa+xGJsFYOlOCBgCglrAtK/1kTQbCJg4WEtv+yvUM cpIAn0E7qSxj8V0W6WhxXmy68fjjlTdP =3xew -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEB22CA24BFAC3E7E0B1A4900--