From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 10 19:59:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5091132F; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5CF41278; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:59:29 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 1209190c-f794a6d000000c27-c6-52f92e6d8908 Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 5E.F7.03111.D6E29F25; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:54:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s1AJsJuG030251; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:54:20 -0500 Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s1AJsGA1024172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:54:18 -0500 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id s1AJsGOZ005546; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:54:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:54:16 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk X-X-Sender: kaduk@multics.mit.edu To: Jamie Landeg-Jones Subject: Re: docs/186608: typo in 'ctime(3) man page In-Reply-To: <201402090702.s1972G1s067725@catnip.dyslexicfish.net> Message-ID: References: <201402090702.s1972G1s067725@catnip.dyslexicfish.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nrpur9zPIYMVpSYtTZ7pYLVqerGa3 eHm7kcmB2eN490JWjxmf5rMEMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZSw5fYa14DBnxfwLvewNjJvZuxg5 OCQETCQWXlPuYuQEMsUkLtxbzwZiCwnMZpLY38YEUiIksJFR4oEfRPgQk8TfG0ldjFxAdgOj RPfTF2A1LALaEmfOGIPUsAmoSTze28wKMVJRYvOpScwgtoiAvsSBhxvAxjML2Eosvv0YzBYG uqB5/VFGEJtTwEniwPlLYPW8Ag4SHz81sELsdZQ4eaERrF5UQEdi9f4pLBA1ghInZz5hgZhp KXHuz3W2CYxCs5CkZiFJLWBkWsUom5JbpZubmJlTnJqsW5ycmJeXWqRrqJebWaKXmlK6iREU wpySPDsY3xxUOsQowMGoxMN74dOPICHWxLLiytxDjJIcTEqivAVaP4OE+JLyUyozEosz4otK c1KLDzFKcDArifDuVgLK8aYkVlalFuXDpKQ5WJTEeRNnvAkSEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CycpwcChJ 8HrqAjUKFqWmp1akZeaUIKSZODhBhvMADfcDqeEtLkjMLc5Mh8ifYlSUEud9owOUEABJZJTm wfXCUswrRnGgV4R5o0HaeYDpCa77FdBgJqDBR5t+gAwuSURISTUwppc7Tmfk3b/AbZaK/ZWG 6weYl1Xk/MoyYbGJmJ+cNv1Q1qPiouwVfyKKqjo2RfxRY0i0er3N5j5XRFNKzbJtch0L9R7q /Ah5wb1HseTjapH9JbutFaeX/G4pjJ3R/Tps+cTK986tBVnLFZweWZ/fs41ZKsSf6+usqRPe LZLieM1TpvdYONRHiaU4I9FQi7moOBEACWU/6AwDAAA= Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:59:30 -0000 On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > >> Description: > > Another typo. This time in ctime.3 man page.. I realise this is in > 'contrib' but there doesn't seem to be any info regarding who this is > pulled from. I think that the current ~upstream for the tzcode is supposed to be https://github.com/eggert/tz/ , but I haven't checked particularly recently. (There was some excitement involving a legal action, etc., so it had gone away and/or moved.) That said, I don't see a BUGS section at all in the newctime.3 in that repo, and I also don't see the erroneous line you quote in the history of that repo, so ... I'm not sure what happened. > I hope I don't get the reputation for most anal contributor :-( Definitely not! > (Is a PR the best way to report something so insignificant? Seems like > overkill... Gimme doc commit access!) PR is fine, it gives us a place to look when we need to find things. > Anyway.... The word 'leaves' instead of 'leave' in the following line: > > "-these functions leaves their result in an internal static object and return" Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to think about what the best route to a fix is. -Ben