From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 24 15:07:22 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id PAA08860
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:07:22 -0700
Received: from elf.kendall.mdcc.edu (elf.kendall.mdcc.edu [147.70.150.122])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA08850
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:07:16 -0700
Received: (from freelist@localhost) by elf.kendall.mdcc.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA07136; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 17:57:46 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 17:57:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Don's FList drop" <freelist@elf.kendall.mdcc.edu>
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GOOD and W/O extras ISDN modem - advice needed.
In-Reply-To: <199508241727.MAA19891@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950824175638.7077B-100000@elf.kendall.mdcc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 24 Aug 1995, Joe Greco wrote:

> this in some fashion.  You cannot do 128K on an async link because 128K
> isn't a standard RS232 speed.  Your next choice would probably be 230.4K,
> but I haven't seen any terminal adaptors that support this speed, and you
> need a special serial port to handle it.  Anyways, in conclusion: An ISDN TA
> does not deal with analog information in any way.

Aren't there a few ISDN adaptors out there with parallel and ethernet 
interfaces to deal with this speed problem?