From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 17 05:35:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0737106566B for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trent@snakebite.org) Received: from exchange.liveoffice.com (exchla3.liveoffice.com [64.70.67.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CE48FC14 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from exhub01.exchhosting.com (192.168.11.213) by exhub09.exchhosting.com (192.168.11.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:35:30 -0700 Received: from EXMBX10.exchhosting.com ([fe80::9c37:32f6:a508:a44f]) by exhub01.exchhosting.com ([fe80::599f:91db:6abf:be9f%13]) with mapi; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:35:29 -0700 From: Trent Nelson To: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:35:28 -0700 Thread-Topic: The MFC process... Thread-Index: Ac1j3fmGLrIHLoVbTXKOMWy3RP9Y6g== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: The MFC process... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:35:31 -0000 On 7/16/12 11:19 PM, "Eitan Adler" wrote: >On 16 July 2012 19:33, Trent Nelson wrote: >> >> There are currently no automated MFC systems in place, correct? I.e. >>the >> onus is completely on the developer that made the change to head to >>merge >> back to stable? > >Correct. > >> Do the RELENG team do anything in particular to check >> that changes for MFC actually make it back to stable? > >As far as I am aware, they do not. Sounds like a "what-hasn't-been-MFC'd-back-to-stable-yet" script could be quite useful, then ;-) Thanks for the info. Trent.