From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Sep 16 0:16:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.lucida.qc.ca (alpha.lucida.qc.ca [216.95.146.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC0137B42C for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 00:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 91809 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Sep 2000 07:16:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2000 07:16:04 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 03:16:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman To: will@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/20238: New port addition. In-Reply-To: <200009160422.VAA35355@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks Will! Ironically enough though, 1.4.1 is now out. I've already updated my local ports here and thanks to Mark (the author) and his willingness to work with me on mmucl & FreeBSD, virtually no patching is required except to honour ${PREFIX} et al. My question is: Should I be sending that diff to you (Will) or should I simply send-pr them as I did with the initial port addition? Cheers, Matt On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 will@FreeBSD.org wrote: : Synopsis: New port addition. : : State-Changed-From-To: open->closed : State-Changed-By: will : State-Changed-When: Fri Sep 15 21:22:06 PDT 2000 : State-Changed-Why: : Committed, thanks! : : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20238 : * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5wx40dMMtMcA1U5ARAvOTAJ9fD9JbmtXSemzgdb3ieg79ibFELwCfX966 BSOKou0UFXxbcU4MqWO31sI= =qG2b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message