From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Jan 24 14:33:13 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA27204 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:33:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pc144s118r1.jancomulti.com (pc144s118r1.jancomulti.com [195.139.118.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA27199 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:33:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psommerh@jancomulti.com) Received: from jancomulti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pc144s118r1.jancomulti.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA00405; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:29:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from psommerh@jancomulti.com) Message-ID: <36AB9ED2.E540ACC5@jancomulti.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:29:38 +0100 From: "Pål Sommerhein" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Gleason CC: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, dg@root.com Subject: Re: Need alternative to Intel Etherexpress Pro/100B References: <000e01be47d7$1bd076a0$f1effccd@bug.tasam.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Joe Gleason wrote: > > I always like my 3com 905's or 3com 905b's. I run almost all of my > systems with them. > Durring my network stress testing, I got them up to 95% to 100mb > without any problems. Do you know (or anybody else :)) how the 3com 905's compare to the Intel Etherexpress Pro/100+ ? (which David Greenman just pointed out is functionally equivalent to the Intel Etherexpress 100/B. Thank you David :)) Thanks and take care, Pal Sommerhein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message