From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 11 04:13:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D1D1065670; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 04:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B388FC08; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 04:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pBB4D6SQ047961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:13:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pBB4D6Mq047960; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA01207; Sat, 10 Dec 11 20:08:35 PST Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:07:44 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: crees@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4ee48f00.9Xf1dW5Lha4OAbab%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201112070829.pB78TfvA074645@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> <4ee38205.jL9x8Xyja2KPi1vT%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4EE33638.9070706@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EE33638.9070706@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 04:13:07 -0000 Chris Rees wrote: > >> portname: misc/gtkfind ... > > Looking at the Makefile, it appears that this port does not > > claim to have a MASTER_SITES other than MASTER_SITE_BACKUP, i.e. > > the FreeBSD servers. IOW, it looks as if we _are_ the upstream. > > > Hm. Are you interested in using it? I don't mind hosting it but > it could do with a maintainer. Remember, we're only the upstream > if someone is responsible for it. I will maintain it if no one else comes forward. > Also, its last update appears to be in 2003, and it's long dead.... s/long dead/in good enough shape to be useful/ :)