From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 28 09:40:23 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA21449 for current-outgoing; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:40:23 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA21443 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:40:18 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA01126; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:34:53 -0800 To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: select() and setrlimit() broken In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:01:59 +0100." <199511280801.JAA09627@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:34:52 -0800 Message-ID: <1124.817580092@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > As -Vince- wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone know if select() and setrlimit() is broken in -CURRENT sinc e > > they don't behave the way they should as compared to every other UN*X > > variant. Any info would be helpful. Thanks! > > They are not. The entire system wouldn't work if they were. Indeed. I believe this is just yet another example of Vince not coding the way he should, as compared with every other UN*X programmer. :-) Jordan