From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 22:40:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A3E16A4CE for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:40:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lap.dougb.net (c-24-130-160-161.we.client2.attbi.com [24.130.160.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAF343D41 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:40:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lap.dougb.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2R6eQvB001074; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:40:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:40:26 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Brooks Davis In-Reply-To: <20040324230328.GA5801@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Message-ID: <20040326223853.H984@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <20040324135724.L88409@qbhto.arg> <20040324230328.GA5801@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "freebsd-rc@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/etc rc.subr src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile cleanvar cleartmp diskless hostname resolv tmp var (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:40:31 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 01:58:10PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > Was this project discussed with anyone (Mike? Gordon?) before it went > > into effect? > > I posted to -arch. At the time I sent out the diff there was no better > place to post because this list didn't exist and the Yahoo list that > labled all my mail as spam and passed the real spam through untagged. > This might not have been the perfect approach, but what's done is done. > I'd be happy to correct real problems with the code if needed. Ok, thanks for clarifying. :) I didn't mean to imply that there was anything wrong with your work, a very cursory exam indicated that you're going in the right direction. Since your commit touched a lot of files, I just wanted to be sure that it wasn't happening willy nilly. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection