Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:58:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268386] editor/emacs-devel: PGTK option with X server is unsupported Message-ID: <bug-268386-7788-fXkGdxTWp1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-268386-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-268386-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268386 Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(emacs@ | |FreeBSD.org) CC| |emacs@FreeBSD.org, | |jbeich@FreeBSD.org Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |emacs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- If stability is a real concern PGTK (and maybe XAW) can probably be moved i= nto a flavor. Unfortunately, without provides/requires in Mk/bsd.port.mk that m= ay require bloating USES=3Demacs packages with more flavors. -devel suffix in emacs-devel already implies adventurous users: Emacs snaps= hots can cause crashes or break Elisp code. According to bsdstats "emacs-nox" (63) is more popular than "emacs" (49) and "emacs-devel" (2) is more popular than "emacs-devel-nox" (0). The ratio discrepancy is curious and can imply a subset chose "emacs-devel" because of Wayland support. Disclaimer: I'm not part of emacs@, just a Wayland user using emacs-devel b= ut not represented in bsdstats (to avoid bias for my ports). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268386-7788-fXkGdxTWp1>