From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 23 21:32:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDF577E; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7BA92B; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::b9f0:3633:d663:add7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:b9f0:3633:d663:add7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4694F5C43; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 22:32:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_706FC58F-004D-4E56-9856-22E4EBAEFCB3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: [releng_10 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <8EA3BF27-225E-4818-8983-8793FCDF08D9@bsdimp.com> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 22:31:58 +0100 Message-Id: References: <201403231522.s2NFM5Kc019213@worker01.tb.des.no> <8EA3BF27-225E-4818-8983-8793FCDF08D9@bsdimp.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:32:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_706FC58F-004D-4E56-9856-22E4EBAEFCB3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 23 Mar 2014, at 17:59, Warner Losh wrote: > About the time clang was MFC=92d, this started appearing. It has been = several days now. >=20 > Did the clang MFC botch something? Was the timing just a coincidence? I hope the latter, but I didn't investigate yet. I do know that I ran a make universe before the clang 3.4 merge, and that worked just fine. That said, at first glance this looks like some sort of scripting problem? Does anybody know off the top of their heads where ARM_NARCH and ARM_NMMUS are coming from? -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_706FC58F-004D-4E56-9856-22E4EBAEFCB3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlMvUtEACgkQsF6jCi4glqNwdQCgx3joabmx/I3AvpyTnLen9RWg 3r8AnRfhvmBqK+RvihvHs2kq7CN4CoOj =KQec -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_706FC58F-004D-4E56-9856-22E4EBAEFCB3--