Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 12:15:16 +0100 From: "Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org" <jhs@vector.enet> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: Sergio Lenzi <lenzi@cwbtwo.bsi.com.br>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INGRES 8.9 Message-ID: <199512031115.MAA11581@vector.enet> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Dec 1995 18:54:21 EST." <Pine.SUN.3.91.951202184954.8717A-100000@latte.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Responding to: > From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> > Subject: Re: INGRES 8.9 > Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 18:54:21 -0500 (EST) > Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951202184954.8717A-100000@latte.eng.umd.edu> Notes: - I have removed cc: hackers@ & retained cc: ports@ to reduce cross posting. - I was a bit suprised to see this, as I thought I'd sent private mail to Sergio, but I guess my mouse slipped down the exmh scroll bar one place too far :-) - As quoted, I was in a rush, & have volunteered to work with Sergio :-) > On Fri, 1 Dec 1995, Sergio Lenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 1995, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Well I ftp'd them & had a v. quick look, > > > For it to be considered a `FreeBSD ported package' > > > it needs a top Makefile that is > > > bsd make, not gnu make > > > (you can have gnus in the work/ subdir) > > > /usr/ingre/src is unacceptable, > > > it must reside in /usr/ports/databases/ingres > > You know, Julian, there is such a thing as a package, it's not a port, > and it already is built. I didn't think he claimed he had a port, I > thought he said it was a package. Good point ! I'd almost forgotten what a mere `package' is, now we have almost exclusively `ports' ... I plead guilty to wishful thinking/assumption, ( but see above: "For it to be considered a `FreeBSD ported package'" ^^^^^^ ) > The bin part of it surely is, > anyways. I think it might be right to urge him to put it in as a > port, but completely unfair to tell him he did it wrong. I did _NOT_ tell him he'd done it wrong ! Now you are being unfair ! I asked him to convert it to a package, & volunteered to test it & commit it if it was OK. > I like ports, you like ports, but there IS that alternative, and I think > asking him to go that extra step is more friendly than telling him he's > wrong because he didn't. > > > anyway I'm out of time, > > > but it doesnt qualify as a FreeBSD package ... yet, > > > > > > Would you like to look at a few of the 400 /usr/ports/*/*/Makefile, > > > grab the syntax out of a few, & write a makefile & DESC & pkg/ stuff, > > > > > > then when you've done that i'll test it & if OK commit it. > > As I see, the interest is growing, I'll promiss to make a > > real "PORT", thanks to your assistance. My job in bsi.com.br (an internet > > provider is taking me almost all of my time). > > May be in 1 week or later a "port" will be in "place". Frankly Chuck, Sergio & I had sorted this out without you, however as you have injected yourself into the proceedings, I now cede to you the honour of testing Sergio's forthcoming port; let me know when you've finished & it's ready to commit please. Thanks. > ============================================================================ > Chuck Robey chuckr@eng.umd.edu -- I run FreeBSD on n3lxx and Journey2 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > The Dilbert Zone is Dilbert's new WWW home! The area > features never-before-seen original sketches of Dilbert, a photo tour > of Scott Adams' studio, Dilbert Trivia and memorabilia, high > school photos and much more!: > <URL:http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/dilbert/>; > Julian - --- Julian H. Stacey jhs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512031115.MAA11581>