From owner-freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Sun Sep 29 02:23:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECF6EB127 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46gq7v4mVjz3x7y for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A39C0EB126; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: xfce@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A355BEB125 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46gq7v2N1sz3x7w for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3625CB067 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8T2N7oK098670 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8T2N7qq098664 for xfce@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: xfce@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240811] x11/xfce4-screensaver: Has same names as other screensaver applications in XFCE Settings Autostart GUI Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jlmales@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfce@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 02:23:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240811 --- Comment #17 from John --- In bug #240804 re: "Please do= n't rush things. "Please let's keep the conversation in one place only. This is one bug. with two strictly related problems." First the three bugs (bug #240804, bug #240810, and this bug #240811) is not because of some feeling of rush needed. That is implied in the bug classification of scope of users affected. Bug #240804 is not the same issue as this bug firstly. Secondly in order to address bug #240804 in a reasonable manner this bug #240811 and bug #240810 need to be addressed first and strictly speaking are not the cause of bug $240804. Even if both bug #240810 and bug #240811 had unique names for the XFCE Setting Autostart GUI and the file manager views would not prevent bug #240804 from occurring. This issue is strictly about a user not knowing wh= at screensaver is enabled and/or if there are duplicate entries for the exact = same screensaver in the XFCE4 Settings Autostart GUI and file manager views. Th= is bug is not about nor is same as bug #240804. Hence a this bug was created = not because I like writing bug reports, but because it is a different issue that means it needs a different bug report. Before bug #240804 can be addressed this bug and bug #240810 need to be addressed first. This is so the different applications of same type have s= ome manner of allowing XFCE project of knowing so and in what manner XFCE will identify such same/similar applications that will allow XFCE to decide how = to address the issue of bug #240804. This also means the proposed patch I submitted was just t= hat, a proposed patch aware and noting there are other translations besides English that need to be addressed by XFCE. The proposed patch also was proposed knowing the proposed wording changes in the proposed patch may be different= due to how XFCE decides. That means the proposed patch was just that proposed patch knowing that the finial decision would be per the upstream XFCE proje= ct.=20 This is why I made it clear this was a proposed patch and that the proposed patch clearly needed other translations to be effected to be a finial fix p= atch knowing that the upstream project is responsible for a complete patch of the xfce4-screensaver.desktop file. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=