From owner-freebsd-ipfw  Fri Jul 26 15:38:29 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88E837B400
	for <ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA8343E42
	for <ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by iguana.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g6QMcON13465;
	Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:38:24 -0700
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To: "Jo B. Grasmo" <needle+ipfw@verloid.net>
Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IPFW2
Message-ID: <20020726153824.G12623@iguana.icir.org>
References: <20020725125346.A8987@dustpuppy.world-online.no> <20020725104256.B806@iguana.icir.org> <20020727000831.A2252@resentment.verloid.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20020727000831.A2252@resentment.verloid.net>; from needle+ipfw@verloid.net on Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 12:08:31AM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ipfw.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ipfw>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ipfw>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 12:08:31AM +0200, Jo B. Grasmo wrote:
...
> Quite, but also notice that "keep-state" is moved from after "setup" to

so, keep-state is certainly meant to be the last opcode in a rule,
i will update the userland and the kernel to make sure that this
condition is verified.

Other options can be in arbitrary order, and I think that trying
to make the code print in a specified order is not worth pursuing,
especially given that you can have OR blocks now.
But it is all a matter of adding complexity to the userland
part, so if there are volunteers I'll be glad to integrate
the code in ipfw2.c

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message