From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 17 13:20:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B78710656AB for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81D8FC20 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7HDK3LK040181 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7HDK35m040179; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:20:03 GMT Message-Id: <201008171320.o7HDK35m040179@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: walter@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero) Cc: Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Walter C. Pelissero" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS. From: walter@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero) To: Oliver Fromme Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:09:23 +0200 Oliver Fromme writes: > The problem with this patch is that it breaks backwards- > compatibility. Some people might already use backslashes As far as I remember, the patch I proposed allowed a double backslash ('\\') to mean a single backslash ('\'). > in /etc/fstab, for whatever reason. This change would > make them rather unhappy, I'm afraid. Being unhappy for having to change a couple of entries in fstab is not nearly as bad as not being able to insert an entry altogether. > One way to circumvent the problem would be to use glabel(8) Yes, or mlabel(1). Although reformatting (and, thus, relabelling) is common on devices such as digital camera; it saves time compared to deleting everything. -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.de