From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 6 13:14: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C151D14D70 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:13:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by phk.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA24018; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 22:11:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA63445; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 22:11:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: paul@originative.co.uk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EGCS optimizations In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Apr 1999 13:01:07 PDT." <199904062001.NAA10310@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 22:11:37 +0200 Message-ID: <63443.923429497@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199904062001.NAA10310@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes: > That test was 100% cpu bound. There was no ( significant ) I/O. I ran > it a few times to build the cache before timing it. What is the stddev on your measurements ? a delta-T 1 second need a very tight stddev to be significant. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message