From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 06:31:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7687716A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe02.swip.net [212.247.154.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1016813C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [193.71.38.142] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO [10.42.11.147]) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTPA id 475544532; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:31:38 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:31:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <882430.74309.qm@web32712.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <882430.74309.qm@web32712.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704250831.20752.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Subject: Re: VESA Free standards X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:31:45 -0000 On Wednesday 25 April 2007 02:27, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi; > > I noticed there is a nice set of VESA standards freely available by filling > the form in: > > http://www.vesa.org/Standards/free.htm > > Of course the Wikipedia also includes a description of the interesting > ones: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions > > I am not sure if FreeBSD's vesa driver supports the full 3.0 specification > but it would be really nice to newbussify it and perhaps add a new driver > for the VESA Audio Interface standard. Any takers? I think it is better to have the source code of HW, than using a BIOS driver. What if the BIOS code is overridden by a boot-sector virus. Then you keep the virus alive by using this BIOS code. Just a thought though. --HPS