From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 14:28:01 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06600
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA06585
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:27:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from henrich@localhost)
          by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id RAA00951; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 17:27:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-Id: <199703022227.RAA00951@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 17:27:23 -0500 (EST)
Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302182127.9863H-100000@thelab.hub.org> from The Hermit Hacker at "Mar 2, 97 06:22:58 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
>
> > ./rc5-56-client -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 8.565 seconds. (116754.49 keys/sec)
>
> > ./rc5-56-client -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 8.540 seconds. (117097.90 keys/sec)
>
> > ./rc5-client-freebsd -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 8.038 seconds. (124401.52 keys/sec)
>

Hmm the one amancio put up seems like the old one.  Try the one at
ftp.scnc.k12.mi.us/pub/misc/rc5-56-freebsd

-Crh


       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich