From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 08:59:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6531065672 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD1F8FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so2040075pzk.18 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 01:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=F1uyQH5owknnCHa8MxcghC72RHg9jF+A6h5kNHC2PTA=; b=t1xjNo7VuGAvLlemel4xE1LaNHIO9/sooUHjob4IQlG/Xqt1J0mRYmDN3qZl/jY7z3 1tGk1pMgWmVQKov/jSdtp3xogHG2c68KW6TVK1l3ajEBTGkZx8p/AQYFiSiHGUsxOmyc LOnerEC7oxdMpSLzc8j9kuy5B0obtxxbf/DE0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.48.20 with SMTP id v20mr3171528wfv.115.1312621173462; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 01:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.43.133 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 04:59:33 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:59:34 -0000 Peter Holm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt > > > > Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/tmpfs.7.patch > > Looks good. The mmap(2) test doesn't panic any more, nor does any of > the other TMPFS tests I have. Is this patch under consideration for inclusion in 9.0? b.