From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 7 11: 0:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD6D37B416 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:00:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20011207190010.XCJV24045.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 19:00:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA15869; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:53:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:53:07 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Lars Eggert Cc: rick norman , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nat through two DSL In-Reply-To: <3C1103D6.9020106@isi.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If you were using PPPoE for the DSL, then you could possibly use multilink ppp. The trick would be to see if the ppp server at the other end can recognise multilink PPP when it's getting it's ppp off ATM/PPPoE.. On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote: > rick norman wrote: > > > What would be nice would be to load balance on a per connection > > basis, not a per packet basis, between the two modems. > > Any ideas how to do this ? > > > Not with the current mechanisms in FreeBSD. You'd need a simple policy > routing engine (actually, policy forwarding). A prototype based on tun > devices shouldn't be too hard to put together. Basically, you'd want to > pick one of your links based on destination address and optionally the > port pair. > > We're putting something similar together for the DynaBone project > (http://www.isi.edu/dynabone/), but it just got underway. > > >>>Anders Hagman wrote: > >>>>The ADSL are 500k links and I want to load share on session by session. > > Ah, just caught the "session by session" part on second reading. In this > case, my prior comment about packet-level striping and TCP is moot. > > Lars > -- > Lars Eggert Information Sciences Institute > http://www.isi.edu/larse/ University of Southern California > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message