From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 16 12:12:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1B537B401 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from glow.dt1.slik.org (glow.binity.net [213.84.201.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD4543F6B for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:12:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spam@walter.slik.org) Received: from rez.dt1.slik.org (rez.dt1.slik.org [172.23.7.20]) by glow.dt1.slik.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E80A93A for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:12:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from walter.slik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rez.dt1.slik.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F308FFEE for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:12:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:12:28 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: newbie - port version Q From: Walter Hop To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, I maintain one feeble port (xmms-musepack), and the developers have=20 decided to renumber their versions... old version: 1.8.0 new version: 0.98 :) You will probably understand my dilemma.. Any suggestions for the new port version? =46rom the handbook I guess 0.98,1 will be the best=20 solution, although an EPOCH for such a little port seems a bit overkill. I'd like to do it right though, so any input on how these things are handled=20 usually is welcome! thanks! walter --=20 Walter Hop | +31 6 24452020 | http://www.skydancer.nl/= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message