Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 01:17:22 +0000 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r343559 - head/net-p2p/litecoin Message-ID: <20140210011718.GA79272@mouf.net> In-Reply-To: <201402092329.s19NTHiq089517@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201402092329.s19NTHiq089517@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 11:29:17PM +0000, John Marino wrote: > Author: marino > Date: Sun Feb 9 23:29:16 2014 > New Revision: 343559 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/343559 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r343559/ > > Log: > net-p2p/litecoin: Fix DragonFly (broken by OSVERSION) > > Limit OSVERSION-based modifications to FreeBSD. This port suddenly > broken and the use of OSVERSION without OPSYS was the cause. > > Modified: > head/net-p2p/litecoin/Makefile > > Modified: head/net-p2p/litecoin/Makefile > ============================================================================== > --- head/net-p2p/litecoin/Makefile Sun Feb 9 23:18:17 2014 (r343558) > +++ head/net-p2p/litecoin/Makefile Sun Feb 9 23:29:16 2014 (r343559) > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ QMAKE_USE_DBUS= 0 > PLIST_FILES+= share/applications/litecoin-qt.desktop share/pixmaps/litecoin64.png > .endif > > -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000054 > +.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} >= 1000054 > EXTRA_PATCHES+= ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-endian > .endif > Shouldn't this have required maintainer approval? Or am I confused? Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140210011718.GA79272>