From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 29 21:49:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EE716A508 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803C144035 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so2869534nfc for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:43:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mYH5Q+SsGMM4AOR0Qr+V2eB3R+vsqpWqROYfck3vNlGzLefai58FmWEtb9RpLmPOyux9vSRTcjQ06ZBf6+e+r4BiJMkshga1WD81fAewAYSitj5Rw4uGWI5R/jJN98N8thiM27d2ep2pbn5TRoZeHZT5n2k/G5Hy6/K51Z5HeM4= Received: by 10.82.131.1 with SMTP id e1mr686673bud.1164836600909; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:43:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:43:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:43:20 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Brian In-Reply-To: <456DBEB0.4010102@sonicboom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <456DBEB0.4010102@sonicboom.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packages ports and portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:49:26 -0000 On 11/29/06, Brian wrote: > Is there a difference in allocation of package building resources > between v5 and v6 stable versions? > > I use both a v5 and v6 stable box. The v6 box is paid attention to a > lot more closely, the v5 box is a once in awhile test machine. I > noticed yesterday that portupgrade -aP on the v5 box led to most of the > updates happening via package, whereas the v6 box is building most of > them via ports. There are 5.5 packages and (are) not 6.2 packages built for those ports? -- --